Authors' response: Letter to the Editor concerning OCRA as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors

Authors' response to letter to the editor.

We thank Drs. Mandal and Goel for their interest in our work, but we disagree with their interpretation of the literature compared with our findings. While Waldert and associates did indeed find a correlation between a longer delay to nephroureterectomy (NUx) and more advanced stage, they did not report metastasis-free survival. Moreover, they found no difference in cancer-specific survival. Th...

Letter to the Editor: Authors' Response.

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the concerns of Dr Reneman and colleagues about our paper, Kersnovske et al. [13]. Dr Reneman and colleagues have raised two issues that we address below. Their first concern relates to the use of experts for the purpose of validation. We assume the authors are not concerned with the use of experts as a method of content validation, per se, as this is...

Response to the letter to editor

No Abstract is available

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

 This article has no abstract.